package google.api

Mouse Melon logoGet desktop application:
View/edit binary Protocol Buffers messages

message CustomHttpPattern

http.proto:370

A custom pattern is used for defining custom HTTP verb.

Used in: HttpRule

enum FieldBehavior

field_behavior.proto:50

An indicator of the behavior of a given field (for example, that a field is required in requests, or given as output but ignored as input). This **does not** change the behavior in protocol buffers itself; it only denotes the behavior and may affect how API tooling handles the field. Note: This enum **may** receive new values in the future.

message Http

http.proto:30

Defines the HTTP configuration for an API service. It contains a list of [HttpRule][google.api.HttpRule], each specifying the mapping of an RPC method to one or more HTTP REST API methods.

message HttpRule

http.proto:314

# gRPC Transcoding gRPC Transcoding is a feature for mapping between a gRPC method and one or more HTTP REST endpoints. It allows developers to build a single API service that supports both gRPC APIs and REST APIs. Many systems, including [Google APIs](https://github.com/googleapis/googleapis), [Cloud Endpoints](https://cloud.google.com/endpoints), [gRPC Gateway](https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway), and [Envoy](https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy) proxy support this feature and use it for large scale production services. `HttpRule` defines the schema of the gRPC/REST mapping. The mapping specifies how different portions of the gRPC request message are mapped to the URL path, URL query parameters, and HTTP request body. It also controls how the gRPC response message is mapped to the HTTP response body. `HttpRule` is typically specified as an `google.api.http` annotation on the gRPC method. Each mapping specifies a URL path template and an HTTP method. The path template may refer to one or more fields in the gRPC request message, as long as each field is a non-repeated field with a primitive (non-message) type. The path template controls how fields of the request message are mapped to the URL path. Example: service Messaging { rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) { option (google.api.http) = { get: "/v1/{name=messages/*}" }; } } message GetMessageRequest { string name = 1; // Mapped to URL path. } message Message { string text = 1; // The resource content. } This enables an HTTP REST to gRPC mapping as below: HTTP | gRPC -----|----- `GET /v1/messages/123456` | `GetMessage(name: "messages/123456")` Any fields in the request message which are not bound by the path template automatically become HTTP query parameters if there is no HTTP request body. For example: service Messaging { rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) { option (google.api.http) = { get:"/v1/messages/{message_id}" }; } } message GetMessageRequest { message SubMessage { string subfield = 1; } string message_id = 1; // Mapped to URL path. int64 revision = 2; // Mapped to URL query parameter `revision`. SubMessage sub = 3; // Mapped to URL query parameter `sub.subfield`. } This enables a HTTP JSON to RPC mapping as below: HTTP | gRPC -----|----- `GET /v1/messages/123456?revision=2&sub.subfield=foo` | `GetMessage(message_id: "123456" revision: 2 sub: SubMessage(subfield: "foo"))` Note that fields which are mapped to URL query parameters must have a primitive type or a repeated primitive type or a non-repeated message type. In the case of a repeated type, the parameter can be repeated in the URL as `...?param=A&param=B`. In the case of a message type, each field of the message is mapped to a separate parameter, such as `...?foo.a=A&foo.b=B&foo.c=C`. For HTTP methods that allow a request body, the `body` field specifies the mapping. Consider a REST update method on the message resource collection: service Messaging { rpc UpdateMessage(UpdateMessageRequest) returns (Message) { option (google.api.http) = { patch: "/v1/messages/{message_id}" body: "message" }; } } message UpdateMessageRequest { string message_id = 1; // mapped to the URL Message message = 2; // mapped to the body } The following HTTP JSON to RPC mapping is enabled, where the representation of the JSON in the request body is determined by protos JSON encoding: HTTP | gRPC -----|----- `PATCH /v1/messages/123456 { "text": "Hi!" }` | `UpdateMessage(message_id: "123456" message { text: "Hi!" })` The special name `*` can be used in the body mapping to define that every field not bound by the path template should be mapped to the request body. This enables the following alternative definition of the update method: service Messaging { rpc UpdateMessage(Message) returns (Message) { option (google.api.http) = { patch: "/v1/messages/{message_id}" body: "*" }; } } message Message { string message_id = 1; string text = 2; } The following HTTP JSON to RPC mapping is enabled: HTTP | gRPC -----|----- `PATCH /v1/messages/123456 { "text": "Hi!" }` | `UpdateMessage(message_id: "123456" text: "Hi!")` Note that when using `*` in the body mapping, it is not possible to have HTTP parameters, as all fields not bound by the path end in the body. This makes this option more rarely used in practice when defining REST APIs. The common usage of `*` is in custom methods which don't use the URL at all for transferring data. It is possible to define multiple HTTP methods for one RPC by using the `additional_bindings` option. Example: service Messaging { rpc GetMessage(GetMessageRequest) returns (Message) { option (google.api.http) = { get: "/v1/messages/{message_id}" additional_bindings { get: "/v1/users/{user_id}/messages/{message_id}" } }; } } message GetMessageRequest { string message_id = 1; string user_id = 2; } This enables the following two alternative HTTP JSON to RPC mappings: HTTP | gRPC -----|----- `GET /v1/messages/123456` | `GetMessage(message_id: "123456")` `GET /v1/users/me/messages/123456` | `GetMessage(user_id: "me" message_id: "123456")` ## Rules for HTTP mapping 1. Leaf request fields (recursive expansion nested messages in the request message) are classified into three categories: - Fields referred by the path template. They are passed via the URL path. - Fields referred by the [HttpRule.body][google.api.HttpRule.body]. They are passed via the HTTP request body. - All other fields are passed via the URL query parameters, and the parameter name is the field path in the request message. A repeated field can be represented as multiple query parameters under the same name. 2. If [HttpRule.body][google.api.HttpRule.body] is "*", there is no URL query parameter, all fields are passed via URL path and HTTP request body. 3. If [HttpRule.body][google.api.HttpRule.body] is omitted, there is no HTTP request body, all fields are passed via URL path and URL query parameters. ### Path template syntax Template = "/" Segments [ Verb ] ; Segments = Segment { "/" Segment } ; Segment = "*" | "**" | LITERAL | Variable ; Variable = "{" FieldPath [ "=" Segments ] "}" ; FieldPath = IDENT { "." IDENT } ; Verb = ":" LITERAL ; The syntax `*` matches a single URL path segment. The syntax `**` matches zero or more URL path segments, which must be the last part of the URL path except the `Verb`. The syntax `Variable` matches part of the URL path as specified by its template. A variable template must not contain other variables. If a variable matches a single path segment, its template may be omitted, e.g. `{var}` is equivalent to `{var=*}`. The syntax `LITERAL` matches literal text in the URL path. If the `LITERAL` contains any reserved character, such characters should be percent-encoded before the matching. If a variable contains exactly one path segment, such as `"{var}"` or `"{var=*}"`, when such a variable is expanded into a URL path on the client side, all characters except `[-_.~0-9a-zA-Z]` are percent-encoded. The server side does the reverse decoding. Such variables show up in the [Discovery Document](https://developers.google.com/discovery/v1/reference/apis) as `{var}`. If a variable contains multiple path segments, such as `"{var=foo/*}"` or `"{var=**}"`, when such a variable is expanded into a URL path on the client side, all characters except `[-_.~/0-9a-zA-Z]` are percent-encoded. The server side does the reverse decoding, except "%2F" and "%2f" are left unchanged. Such variables show up in the [Discovery Document](https://developers.google.com/discovery/v1/reference/apis) as `{+var}`. ## Using gRPC API Service Configuration gRPC API Service Configuration (service config) is a configuration language for configuring a gRPC service to become a user-facing product. The service config is simply the YAML representation of the `google.api.Service` proto message. As an alternative to annotating your proto file, you can configure gRPC transcoding in your service config YAML files. You do this by specifying a `HttpRule` that maps the gRPC method to a REST endpoint, achieving the same effect as the proto annotation. This can be particularly useful if you have a proto that is reused in multiple services. Note that any transcoding specified in the service config will override any matching transcoding configuration in the proto. Example: http: rules: # Selects a gRPC method and applies HttpRule to it. - selector: example.v1.Messaging.GetMessage get: /v1/messages/{message_id}/{sub.subfield} ## Special notes When gRPC Transcoding is used to map a gRPC to JSON REST endpoints, the proto to JSON conversion must follow the [proto3 specification](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto3#json). While the single segment variable follows the semantics of [RFC 6570](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6570) Section 3.2.2 Simple String Expansion, the multi segment variable **does not** follow RFC 6570 Section 3.2.3 Reserved Expansion. The reason is that the Reserved Expansion does not expand special characters like `?` and `#`, which would lead to invalid URLs. As the result, gRPC Transcoding uses a custom encoding for multi segment variables. The path variables **must not** refer to any repeated or mapped field, because client libraries are not capable of handling such variable expansion. The path variables **must not** capture the leading "/" character. The reason is that the most common use case "{var}" does not capture the leading "/" character. For consistency, all path variables must share the same behavior. Repeated message fields must not be mapped to URL query parameters, because no client library can support such complicated mapping. If an API needs to use a JSON array for request or response body, it can map the request or response body to a repeated field. However, some gRPC Transcoding implementations may not support this feature.

Used in: Http

message ResourceDescriptor

resource.proto:155

A simple descriptor of a resource type. ResourceDescriptor annotates a resource message (either by means of a protobuf annotation or use in the service config), and associates the resource's schema, the resource type, and the pattern of the resource name. Example: message Topic { // Indicates this message defines a resource schema. // Declares the resource type in the format of {service}/{kind}. // For Kubernetes resources, the format is {api group}/{kind}. option (google.api.resource) = { type: "pubsub.googleapis.com/Topic" name_descriptor: { pattern: "projects/{project}/topics/{topic}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project" parent_name_extractor: "projects/{project}" } }; } The ResourceDescriptor Yaml config will look like: resources: - type: "pubsub.googleapis.com/Topic" name_descriptor: - pattern: "projects/{project}/topics/{topic}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project" parent_name_extractor: "projects/{project}" Sometimes, resources have multiple patterns, typically because they can live under multiple parents. Example: message LogEntry { option (google.api.resource) = { type: "logging.googleapis.com/LogEntry" name_descriptor: { pattern: "projects/{project}/logs/{log}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project" parent_name_extractor: "projects/{project}" } name_descriptor: { pattern: "folders/{folder}/logs/{log}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Folder" parent_name_extractor: "folders/{folder}" } name_descriptor: { pattern: "organizations/{organization}/logs/{log}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Organization" parent_name_extractor: "organizations/{organization}" } name_descriptor: { pattern: "billingAccounts/{billing_account}/logs/{log}" parent_type: "billing.googleapis.com/BillingAccount" parent_name_extractor: "billingAccounts/{billing_account}" } }; } The ResourceDescriptor Yaml config will look like: resources: - type: 'logging.googleapis.com/LogEntry' name_descriptor: - pattern: "projects/{project}/logs/{log}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project" parent_name_extractor: "projects/{project}" - pattern: "folders/{folder}/logs/{log}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Folder" parent_name_extractor: "folders/{folder}" - pattern: "organizations/{organization}/logs/{log}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Organization" parent_name_extractor: "organizations/{organization}" - pattern: "billingAccounts/{billing_account}/logs/{log}" parent_type: "billing.googleapis.com/BillingAccount" parent_name_extractor: "billingAccounts/{billing_account}" For flexible resources, the resource name doesn't contain parent names, but the resource itself has parents for policy evaluation. Example: message Shelf { option (google.api.resource) = { type: "library.googleapis.com/Shelf" name_descriptor: { pattern: "shelves/{shelf}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project" } name_descriptor: { pattern: "shelves/{shelf}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Folder" } }; } The ResourceDescriptor Yaml config will look like: resources: - type: 'library.googleapis.com/Shelf' name_descriptor: - pattern: "shelves/{shelf}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Project" - pattern: "shelves/{shelf}" parent_type: "cloudresourcemanager.googleapis.com/Folder"

enum ResourceDescriptor.History

resource.proto:158

A description of the historical or future-looking state of the resource pattern.

Used in: ResourceDescriptor

message ResourceReference

resource.proto:240

Defines a proto annotation that describes a string field that refers to an API resource.

message RoutingParameter

routing.proto:402

A projection from an input message to the GRPC or REST header.

Used in: RoutingRule

message RoutingRule

routing.proto:391

Specifies the routing information that should be sent along with the request in the form of routing header. **NOTE:** All service configuration rules follow the "last one wins" order. The examples below will apply to an RPC which has the following request type: Message Definition: message Request { // The name of the Table // Values can be of the following formats: // - `projects/<project>/tables/<table>` // - `projects/<project>/instances/<instance>/tables/<table>` // - `region/<region>/zones/<zone>/tables/<table>` string table_name = 1; // This value specifies routing for replication. // It can be in the following formats: // - `profiles/<profile_id>` // - a legacy `profile_id` that can be any string string app_profile_id = 2; } Example message: { table_name: projects/proj_foo/instances/instance_bar/table/table_baz, app_profile_id: profiles/prof_qux } The routing header consists of one or multiple key-value pairs. Every key and value must be percent-encoded, and joined together in the format of `key1=value1&key2=value2`. The examples below skip the percent-encoding for readability. Example 1 Extracting a field from the request to put into the routing header unchanged, with the key equal to the field name. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // Take the `app_profile_id`. routing_parameters { field: "app_profile_id" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: app_profile_id=profiles/prof_qux Example 2 Extracting a field from the request to put into the routing header unchanged, with the key different from the field name. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // Take the `app_profile_id`, but name it `routing_id` in the header. routing_parameters { field: "app_profile_id" path_template: "{routing_id=**}" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: routing_id=profiles/prof_qux Example 3 Extracting a field from the request to put into the routing header, while matching a path template syntax on the field's value. NB: it is more useful to send nothing than to send garbage for the purpose of dynamic routing, since garbage pollutes cache. Thus the matching. Sub-example 3a The field matches the template. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // Take the `table_name`, if it's well-formed (with project-based // syntax). routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{table_name=projects/*/instances/*/**}" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: table_name=projects/proj_foo/instances/instance_bar/table/table_baz Sub-example 3b The field does not match the template. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // Take the `table_name`, if it's well-formed (with region-based // syntax). routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{table_name=regions/*/zones/*/**}" } }; result: <no routing header will be sent> Sub-example 3c Multiple alternative conflictingly named path templates are specified. The one that matches is used to construct the header. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // Take the `table_name`, if it's well-formed, whether // using the region- or projects-based syntax. routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{table_name=regions/*/zones/*/**}" } routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{table_name=projects/*/instances/*/**}" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: table_name=projects/proj_foo/instances/instance_bar/table/table_baz Example 4 Extracting a single routing header key-value pair by matching a template syntax on (a part of) a single request field. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // Take just the project id from the `table_name` field. routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{routing_id=projects/*}/**" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: routing_id=projects/proj_foo Example 5 Extracting a single routing header key-value pair by matching several conflictingly named path templates on (parts of) a single request field. The last template to match "wins" the conflict. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // If the `table_name` does not have instances information, // take just the project id for routing. // Otherwise take project + instance. routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{routing_id=projects/*}/**" } routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{routing_id=projects/*/instances/*}/**" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: routing_id=projects/proj_foo/instances/instance_bar Example 6 Extracting multiple routing header key-value pairs by matching several non-conflicting path templates on (parts of) a single request field. Sub-example 6a Make the templates strict, so that if the `table_name` does not have an instance information, nothing is sent. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // The routing code needs two keys instead of one composite // but works only for the tables with the "project-instance" name // syntax. routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{project_id=projects/*}/instances/*/**" } routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "projects/*/{instance_id=instances/*}/**" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: project_id=projects/proj_foo&instance_id=instances/instance_bar Sub-example 6b Make the templates loose, so that if the `table_name` does not have an instance information, just the project id part is sent. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // The routing code wants two keys instead of one composite // but will work with just the `project_id` for tables without // an instance in the `table_name`. routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{project_id=projects/*}/**" } routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "projects/*/{instance_id=instances/*}/**" } }; result (is the same as 6a for our example message because it has the instance information): x-goog-request-params: project_id=projects/proj_foo&instance_id=instances/instance_bar Example 7 Extracting multiple routing header key-value pairs by matching several path templates on multiple request fields. NB: note that here there is no way to specify sending nothing if one of the fields does not match its template. E.g. if the `table_name` is in the wrong format, the `project_id` will not be sent, but the `routing_id` will be. The backend routing code has to be aware of that and be prepared to not receive a full complement of keys if it expects multiple. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // The routing needs both `project_id` and `routing_id` // (from the `app_profile_id` field) for routing. routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{project_id=projects/*}/**" } routing_parameters { field: "app_profile_id" path_template: "{routing_id=**}" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: project_id=projects/proj_foo&routing_id=profiles/prof_qux Example 8 Extracting a single routing header key-value pair by matching several conflictingly named path templates on several request fields. The last template to match "wins" the conflict. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // The `routing_id` can be a project id or a region id depending on // the table name format, but only if the `app_profile_id` is not set. // If `app_profile_id` is set it should be used instead. routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{routing_id=projects/*}/**" } routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{routing_id=regions/*}/**" } routing_parameters { field: "app_profile_id" path_template: "{routing_id=**}" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: routing_id=profiles/prof_qux Example 9 Bringing it all together. annotation: option (google.api.routing) = { // For routing both `table_location` and a `routing_id` are needed. // // table_location can be either an instance id or a region+zone id. // // For `routing_id`, take the value of `app_profile_id` // - If it's in the format `profiles/<profile_id>`, send // just the `<profile_id>` part. // - If it's any other literal, send it as is. // If the `app_profile_id` is empty, and the `table_name` starts with // the project_id, send that instead. routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "projects/*/{table_location=instances/*}/tables/*" } routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{table_location=regions/*/zones/*}/tables/*" } routing_parameters { field: "table_name" path_template: "{routing_id=projects/*}/**" } routing_parameters { field: "app_profile_id" path_template: "{routing_id=**}" } routing_parameters { field: "app_profile_id" path_template: "profiles/{routing_id=*}" } }; result: x-goog-request-params: table_location=instances/instance_bar&routing_id=prof_qux